changes to core writings

General Service Conference meetings, agendas, and notes.
Forum rules
* The business of the General Service Conference is discussed. We make decisions by group conscience, guided by higher power. Those elected as a trustee or delegate can vote on all GSC matters. GAAIS staff can vote on issues related to their area.
* Back and forth discussion of different perspectives is appropriate. We strive to be respectful of all.
* Anonymity reminds us to place principles before personalities.
Post Reply
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2020 10:53 pm

changes to core writings

Post by Scott »

Changes to core writings like the steps, traditions, GSC charter, and mission statement. GSC decided a while back to consider creating guidelines around how often and when this sort of process happens because we don't want to put it on the GSC agenda and revisit wording every time any single member says they prefer some other word choice.

Possible proposal for guidelines around how often and when a major piece can be revised:

To prevent constant revisiting and rehashing certain literature, the wording of a major piece of our fellowship's literature such as the steps, traditions, concepts, or mission statement will:
  • Only be put on the agenda for consideration if it has been at least 5 years since the last revision
  • Require a motion supported by at least 10 members or 2 groups to add such an agenda item
  • Require a reasonable explanation of problems caused by the current wording
GSC has the power to make an exception to these guidelines, but should have a compelling reason to do so.

GSC decides whether or not to move forward with process, and if so the GSC or a GSC subcommittee must:
  • Involve all groups and as many members as possible
  • Poll as many members as possible about potential changes, being very clear and careful to ask Do you believe that the current wording is causing problems? and If so, what wording do you believe will best meet the needs of all members and newcomers? and NOT "What's your personal preference?"
  • Ask if there are any other problems being caused by the focus piece so that all such issues can be resolved with this process, which is very time-consuming and won't be repeated for at least another five years.
  • Run all resulting proposals by all groups
  • Only pass proposals that have the support of at least 3/4 of groups
Post Reply