the word "triggering"
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 5:05 pm
There is clearly some confusion, fear, and resentment around the topic of "triggering" content. I felt the same things but have mostly come to a good place with it, so I just want to share some of my experience.
First, what's true with many difficult issues is that people use the same word in different ways. Two people can be talking about two related yet different things, but think they're talking about the same thing because the same word is used.
I think this is true with "triggering." Way back when, I don't remember hearing the word very often. When it was used, it meant "to set off an intense, automatic psychological reaction that often results in intense pain or unwanted reactive behavior." I remember it being used to describe a situation or a graphic telling of a situation, like a traumatic event or where someone would consistently drink, drug, or act out. I remember a few people who had been triggered into panic attacks, sometimes severe.
Over the past ten to twenty years, the word's use seems to have expanded quite a bit. I hear it a lot. Most of the time, it's used to describe something to which a person reacts with mild to moderate upset. This is very different than the old use of the word.
Sometimes we have misunderstanding on this topic because one person uses "triggering" in the old sense of the word while some listeners hear it in the new sense.
I don't like the new use of the word because it muddies understanding of the old use. When I feel mild to moderate upset over something, I'm upset, not "triggered." I need to do some work on myself. It's not good for me to try to avoid that work and the discomfort guiding me toward that work by trying to make other people adjust their behavior. I am not in favor of group etiquette for this purpose. If we tried to avoid all topics that could be mildly to moderately upsetting, we'd have a huge list, stifle discussion, feel like we're walking on egg shells, and feel resistant and maybe resentful.
I do very much appreciate the old use of the word. We do need a safe space for recovery that does not trigger intense psychological reactions like panic attacks or unnecessarily trigger intense urges to game. (Talking about video gaming will sometimes trigger urges. That's unavoidable. But there is unnecessary talk about video games like naming titles or describing in-game play that we can avoid.)
There's one more way that the word "trigger" has been used, which also muddies it and creates confusion. Sometimes when the Twelve Traditions are not followed, impressions are created that CGAA is affiliated with an outside group, person, organization, religion, or philosophy, or has opinions on a outside issue. A common result is that people who do not belong to or agree with such outside issues/groups get the idea that CGAA is for a specific group that does not include them. They feel alienated, and sometimes upset if they felt tricked or misled. I've heard such alienated people described as "triggered." That's not an accurate or helpful description. If I look into an organization and discover it's run by a certain corporation that I want nothing to do with it, I'm not triggered. I just leave. If I go to a support group and discover it's connected to Scientology, I'm not triggered. I just leave.
I wrote this to sort out my own thoughts and hopefully start meaningful discussion that helps other people sort it out. I think it would help if we used separate words for the separate phenomena, like "upset" to describe upset, "triggered" to describe an intense psychological reaction, and "alienated" to describe alienation.
First, what's true with many difficult issues is that people use the same word in different ways. Two people can be talking about two related yet different things, but think they're talking about the same thing because the same word is used.
I think this is true with "triggering." Way back when, I don't remember hearing the word very often. When it was used, it meant "to set off an intense, automatic psychological reaction that often results in intense pain or unwanted reactive behavior." I remember it being used to describe a situation or a graphic telling of a situation, like a traumatic event or where someone would consistently drink, drug, or act out. I remember a few people who had been triggered into panic attacks, sometimes severe.
Over the past ten to twenty years, the word's use seems to have expanded quite a bit. I hear it a lot. Most of the time, it's used to describe something to which a person reacts with mild to moderate upset. This is very different than the old use of the word.
Sometimes we have misunderstanding on this topic because one person uses "triggering" in the old sense of the word while some listeners hear it in the new sense.
I don't like the new use of the word because it muddies understanding of the old use. When I feel mild to moderate upset over something, I'm upset, not "triggered." I need to do some work on myself. It's not good for me to try to avoid that work and the discomfort guiding me toward that work by trying to make other people adjust their behavior. I am not in favor of group etiquette for this purpose. If we tried to avoid all topics that could be mildly to moderately upsetting, we'd have a huge list, stifle discussion, feel like we're walking on egg shells, and feel resistant and maybe resentful.
I do very much appreciate the old use of the word. We do need a safe space for recovery that does not trigger intense psychological reactions like panic attacks or unnecessarily trigger intense urges to game. (Talking about video gaming will sometimes trigger urges. That's unavoidable. But there is unnecessary talk about video games like naming titles or describing in-game play that we can avoid.)
There's one more way that the word "trigger" has been used, which also muddies it and creates confusion. Sometimes when the Twelve Traditions are not followed, impressions are created that CGAA is affiliated with an outside group, person, organization, religion, or philosophy, or has opinions on a outside issue. A common result is that people who do not belong to or agree with such outside issues/groups get the idea that CGAA is for a specific group that does not include them. They feel alienated, and sometimes upset if they felt tricked or misled. I've heard such alienated people described as "triggered." That's not an accurate or helpful description. If I look into an organization and discover it's run by a certain corporation that I want nothing to do with it, I'm not triggered. I just leave. If I go to a support group and discover it's connected to Scientology, I'm not triggered. I just leave.
I wrote this to sort out my own thoughts and hopefully start meaningful discussion that helps other people sort it out. I think it would help if we used separate words for the separate phenomena, like "upset" to describe upset, "triggered" to describe an intense psychological reaction, and "alienated" to describe alienation.